The international order is undergoing a transformation not seen since the end of the Cold War. The war in Ukraine continues to rage, while strategic competition intensifies in regions like the Arctic, Baltic, Middle East, and Northern Africa. At the same time, authoritarian states—most notably China—are seeking to expand their influence over European economies and societies. These dynamics have forced Europe to rethink its security strategy, particularly as traditional allies like the United States shift their focus to other global regions.

Recent actions and statements from the current administration have fueled concerns in Europe about the future of U.S. commitments to NATO and European security. This uncertainty has prompted the European Union to acknowledge that maintaining the status quo is no longer a viable approach to safeguarding its security interests.

The EU’s Strategic Shift: Readiness 2030

Recognizing the need for a stronger, more autonomous defense posture, the European Parliament recently adopted a resolution urging the EU to bolster security by strengthening relationships with like-minded partners while reducing reliance on non-EU countries. In response, the European Commission has released a whitepaper titled European Defense - Readiness 2030, outlining a vision to modernize and reinforce Europe's defense capabilities.

The Readiness 2030 strategy focuses on three key areas:

1. Closing Capability Gaps and Strengthening the EU Defense Industry – Streamlining industrial programs and simplifying regulations to ensure the European defense sector can scale production efficiently.
2. Deepening the Single Defense Market – Accelerating innovation through disruptive technologies like artificial intelligence and quantum computing.
3. Enhancing European Readiness – Improving military mobility, stockpiling critical supplies, and fostering stronger operational cooperation across EU member states.

As a part of the Readiness 2030 plan, the Commission also presented the ReArm Europe Plan, a set of financial levers for EU Member States, to drive investments in defense capabilities. The ReArm Europe plan enables spending of over EUR 800 billion structured around key initiatives:

• Activating the National Escape Clause under the Stability and Growth Pact, allowing member states to increase defense expenditures.
• Launching the EUR 150 billion Security Action for Europe (SAFE) loan instrument, which will help fund key defense areas such as cybersecurity.
• Expanding the European Investment Bank Group’s scope, enabling it to finance defense and security projects.
• Mobilizing private capital through the Savings and Investment Union, reducing the reliance on public investment in the defense industry.

MEPs are calling for a unified and long-term vision for Europe’s defense sector, emphasizing the importance of increasing common procurement among EU member states to achieve “European Tech Sovereignty.” 

Most recently the European Commission presented a ProtectEU Strategy, a new European internal security strategy that sets out a vision for a stronger union that can jointly anticipate, prevent, and respond to security threats, ensure the safety of its citizens and protect European democracies.

The ProtectEU strategy is based on three key principles:

1. A whole-of-society approach including citizens, businesses, civil society, research, academia, and private entities.
2. Mainstreaming security across all EU initiatives with a built-in security check for new initiatives.
3. Boosting security investments with more resources for law enforcement, better equipment; investments in technology; and stronger EU agencies.

The ProtectEU internal security strategy complements the European Defense - Readiness 2030 Whitepaper, the Preparedness Union Strategy, and the forthcoming European Democracy Shield to form a comprehensive framework for a resilient EU.

What This Means for U.S. Companies

In the short term, European governments have limited alternatives to U.S. companies for certain defense capabilities. A pivot toward Chinese suppliers is unlikely due to China’s close ties with Russia. However, in the medium term, the EU aims to develop domestic alternatives, ensuring that government agencies and critical infrastructure have the option to procure from European firms or entities insulated from foreign government influence.

For U.S. technology and defense firms, this shift underscores the importance of demonstrating an ongoing commitment to Europe’s security and technological needs. Companies must also ensure that their legal and institutional safeguards are robust enough to reassure European partners that they are protected from external governmental pressure.

As Europe takes steps toward greater defense autonomy, U.S. businesses operating in the region must adapt to this changing landscape, remaining engaged and proactive in fostering trust and collaboration with European stakeholders.

‍